It might be possible to organise… but in an ideal world, you’d take all the photos under similar lighting conditions.
I don’t know if I’ve taken enough photos to try and attempt something… and I’ve only got rather crude photo-editing software.
The closest I can think of to what you suggest is one of the German moth sites where they often show a variety of photos. Have a look at:
Korscheltellus lupulina - LepiWiki (common swift, a macro which is in evolutionary terms a micro)
Opisthograptis luteolata - LepiWiki (brimstone, a Geometrid macro, which seems to be stable in terms of its pattern although there seems to be a rather ‘washed out’ example)
Griposia aprilina - LepiWiki (merveille du jour, a Noctuid macro, which is a bit more variable although easily recognisable)
Diarsia mendica - LepiWiki (ingrailed clay, a Noctuid, possibly the most varied macro - and one which is sometimes quite hard to ID, for me at least).
Mimas tiliae - LepiWiki (lime hawk-moth, possibly the most variable hawk-moth).
One of the problems with looking at ‘collections’ is that dead moths often fade. So comparing live specimens today with Victorian ones in the Natural History Museum might be a bit tricky - although it could be instructive.